Playwright vs Airbrowser

A comprehensive comparison for developers building AI agents, web scrapers, and browser automation tools in 2025.

Both Playwright and Airbrowser are powerful browser automation tools, but they're designed for different use cases. This comparison will help you choose the right tool for your needs.

Quick Comparison

Feature Playwright Airbrowser
Anti-Detection Limited (easily detected) Built-in (SeleniumBase UC)
MCP Integration No native support Native MCP server
AI Agent Ready Requires wrapper code Built for AI agents
REST API No (library only) Full REST API
Concurrent Browsers Manual management 100+ with pool management
VNC Debugging No Built-in noVNC
Proxy Per Browser Yes Yes
Docker Deployment Community images Official Docker image
Multi-Language Python, JS, .NET, Java REST API (any language)
Cloudflare Bypass Blocked by default Works out of the box

When to Use Playwright

Playwright is an excellent choice for:

When to Use Airbrowser

Airbrowser is the better choice for:

Anti-Detection: The Key Difference

The biggest difference between Playwright and Airbrowser is anti-detection capability.

Playwright is easily detected by most anti-bot systems because it:

Airbrowser, built on SeleniumBase Undetected Chromedriver, bypasses these detection systems by default. No additional configuration needed.

MCP Integration for AI Agents

If you're building AI agents with Claude, GPT, or other LLMs, Airbrowser provides native Model Context Protocol (MCP) support:

With Playwright, you'd need to build your own wrapper to expose browser actions to AI agents.

The Verdict

Choose Playwright if you're doing E2E testing of your own apps or need cross-browser testing.

Choose Airbrowser if you're building AI agents, scraping protected sites, or need a REST API for browser automation.

Try Airbrowser Free

Get started with a single Docker command. No signup required.

Get Started